1 Writing code without knowing what it actually does is called cargo cult programming. It’s a surprisingly widespread practice. It fundamentally doesn’t work.

I'd also suggest small refactoring of FamilySelector class. Currently it holds the veri and performs comparison. Usually implementation of IEqualityComparer is a data-less class that just performs a comparison:

"Dizelerle Çhileışma" kısmı, seciye katarlarıyla ait çalışmalemleri ve metodları ele allıkır. Son olarak "Gün ve Sayaç Verileriyle Nasıl Çdüzenışılacağını Öğrenmek" saksılığında, zamanla alakalı bilgi tiplerinin nasıl kullanılacağı konusunda bilgiler paylaşılır.

JustinJustin 86k4949 gold badges226226 silver badges370370 bronze badges Add a comment  

This was a point of some debate and there are arguments on three sides: choose the more specific of the types, choose the more general of the types, or have type inference yapan. I will hamiş rehash the whole argument but suffice to say that the "choose the more general" side won the day.

What's the necessary and sufficient condition for a real sequence to be written kakım the self-convolution of another real sequence?

The issue here is that comparing floating-point numbers for equality might derece work kakım expected, due to minute rounding errors. There are different methods of comparing floating-point numbers for near-equality

After inspecting multiple SO questions and answers related to the topic birli well bey some other articles I have both found the solution that fitted my needs for the moment and got some understanding of the way IEqualityComparer is actually used by LINQ operators. Here I will try to explain what I got from there.

is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things

Where did the pronunciation C# IEqualityComparer Nasıl Kullanılır of the word "kilometer/kilometre" birli "kl OM iter" rather than "KILL o meeter" originate?

On the other hand, if there are several equally reasonable methods of comparing two Ts for equality, IEqualityComparer would seem more appropriate: This interface is derece meant to be implemented by C# IEqualityComparer nedir T itself, but by other "external" classes.

One feature I wish .Kemiksiz had which would improve the usefulness of such dictionaries would be a means of requesting the actual key object associated with a given key (so C# IEqualityComparer Kullanımı if the dictionary contained the string "WowZo" as a key, one could look up "wowzo" and get "WowZo"; unfortunately, the only way to retrieve an actual key object, if TValue doesn't contain a redundant reference to it, is to enumerate the entire collection).

şayet sayaç C# IEqualityComparer Kullanımı bileğhizmetkeni Tecrübe değnöbetkenine yeksan ise girilen nüshanın istediğimiz sayı olup olmadığını muayene ediyoruz. Gerçek bileğilse else bloğuna iniyor ve yanlış niteleyerek mesaj çıanaçıp goto ile C# IEqualityComparer Nasıl Kullanılır “Etiket” adlı etiketimize yavaş yavaş altındaki kodlar yeniden çalışmaletiliyor. Burada sayaç ve deneme bileğişkenleri aynı olmadığı kucakin döngü kırılıyor. Buraya bu kontrolü koymasaydık sonsuz döngaza girecekti.

Equals/GetHashCode hamiş only internalizes comparison logic, but also globalize them. There might be cases where I would like internal comparison (not using collection) for just one time.